Search for: "Does 1-30 defendants"
Results 181 - 200
of 7,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 4:21 pm
A few initial thoughts: 1) Quinn’s clients include both Cruise and GM. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Winter was coming, as it does. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am
How Does Chelation Therapy Work? [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Much of the world was riveted for two days earlier this month as lawyers chastised and defended Israel on the floor of the International Court of Justice in South Africa’s lawsuit alleging that Israel has been violating its obligations under the Convention against Genocide. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
Rotroff, 30 Fla. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:04 pm
Author of a multitude of highly regarded publications on HIPAA and other medical record and data privacy and scribe for the ABA JCEB Annual Meeting with the HHS Office of Civil Rights, her experience includes extensive involvement throughout her career in advising health care and life sciences and other clients about preventing, investigating and defending EEOC, DOJ, OFCCP and other Civil Rights Act, Section 1557 and other HHS, HUD, banking, and other federal and state discrimination… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:02 pm
§ 36-11-1. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Lawyers are usually given 30 days to respond to a complaint. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
Title II does not create a right to information. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
” Ok, so what does that mean? [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
The doctrine does not apply where a petitioner challenges a single discrete action, inaction, or decision and the resulting effects, even if continuous, are not intrinsically unlawful (Application of Ayers, 48 Ed Dept Rep 350, Decision No. 15,883; Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 48 id. 146, Decision No. 15,821, art 78 dismissed Matter of Reyes v Mills [Sup Ct, Albany County 2009, Zwack, J.]).I agree with respondent that petitioner’s reassignment was a discrete act… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
The doctrine does not apply where a petitioner challenges a single discrete action, inaction, or decision and the resulting effects, even if continuous, are not intrinsically unlawful (Application of Ayers, 48 Ed Dept Rep 350, Decision No. 15,883; Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 48 id. 146, Decision No. 15,821, art 78 dismissed Matter of Reyes v Mills [Sup Ct, Albany County 2009, Zwack, J.]).I agree with respondent that petitioner’s reassignment was a discrete act… [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
Not only does this contradict the principle that “injunctive relief should be no more burdensome to the defendant than necessary to provide complete relief to the plaintiffs,” it could also cause serious harm to nonparties who had no opportunity to argue for more limited relief. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am
On or about November 30, 2016, Dribusch filed a petition in Bankruptcy Court, thereby staying the foreclosure action. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
From a methodological perspective, the CJEU’s latest ruling does not fit squarely within the uniform reading of the GDPR that the Court had previously adopted with respect to the interpretation of Article 82 GDPR. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
During the close-to-close trading sessions affected by a short report, defendant issuers’ stock price declined by 16.8%, on average, and incurred additional declines of 16.0% during the 90-day look-back period of Section 21D(e)(1) of the Private Securities and Litigation Reform Act.[3][4] Third, Rule 10b-5 private securities fraud lawsuits based primarily on activist short-seller research may not be indicative of actual fraud-on-the-market since the work product… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
But the rule I set out to defend—where ill-gotten evidence is excluded irrespective of the underlying crime or the nature of the officer’s misconduct—is dead, and it has been for a while. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:20 am
It starts with the pre-trial prep. 1. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
In that case, a jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll and awarded Carroll a total of $5 million in damages.[1] This trial, Carroll I, centers solely on similar defamatory statements Trump made in 2019 and now solely on the question of damages owed. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm
Blogpost 1/2024 Disclaimer: The views in this blog are strictly personal and do not in any way represent an official position of the Dutch government. [read post]
