Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 181 - 200 of 4,572
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2023, 6:06 am by Maksym Vishchyk
Thus, the imposed treaty is absolutely void in its entirety and ab initio (VCLT, Articles 44(5), 69(1)). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
As such, he maintained that their relationship with Uber was governed by Ontario’s Employment Standards Act, 2000, S.O. 2000 c. 41 (ESA), and therefore the drivers were entitled to the benefit of the ESA. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:44 am by David Pocklington
Where a treasure does not have a monetary value there is still a heavy onus on those who seek its removal”. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
’”[19] The Court held “[t]hat a claim is fact-intensive does not preclude dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) if the plaintiff fails to allege facts plausibly supporting a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Mersinger Regarding Enforcement Actions Against: 1) Opyn, Inc.; 2) Deridex, Inc.; and 3) ZeroEx, Inc. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:30 am by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
We just completed two articles on the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) [1] and, before that, two articles on Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audits. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm by Bill Marler
 [1,4] The “O” and “H” antigens on the bacteria and their flagella distinguish the different serotypes. [4] It is important to remember that most kinds of E. coli bacteria do not cause disease in humans. [1, 2] Indeed, some E. coliare beneficial, while some cause infections other than gastrointestinal infections, such as urinary tract infections. [1]  The E. coli that are responsible for the numerous reports of… [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:11 pm by admin
” Interestingly, IARC does not refer to Category I carcinogens as “known” carcinogens, although many commentators are prone to do so. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Analysis On the issue of liability for damages, the trial judge addressed four issues: (1) Whether the wife’s tort claim was properly considered as part of the family law proceedings; (2) Whether a tort of family violence should be recognized; (3) Whether the husband was liable in damages for his conduct during the marriage; and (4) If so, what damages should he pay? [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The dedicated staff of this agency does extraordinary work with limited resources. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:30 am by Gareth Davies
    The question of causation The General Court treated this, quite correctly, as a matter concerning the non-contractual liability of the Union and its organs, for which liability there is a three part test (Bergarderm, para 41-42): (1) there must be a rule intended to confer rights on individuals: (2) a sufficiently serious breach of that rule; and (3) damage caused as a result. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:06 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The OD rejected the application based on Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR (lack of distinctiveness). [read post]