Search for: "Does 1-96" Results 181 - 200 of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2007, 2:06 am
First, John Doe No. 1 shall not participate in any manner, at any level, in the State of Missouri's lethal injection process. 2. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:04 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This does not mean, however, that the filing of a divisional application could be regarded as a response to the said communication within the meaning of A 96(2). [2.3] A divisional application is legally and administratively separate and independent from the grant proceedings concerning the parent application (see G 1/05 [3.1 and 8.1]; T 441/92 [4.1]). [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:01 pm
Kleinman Realty Co., 92 Ohio St. 96 (1915)) that provides that changes in the use of an easement are permitted to the extent that they result from “the normal growth and development of the dominant land”. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Also the appellants submitted that due to a “release” of the activity of the original substance to the diluent during the multiple dilutions, the diluent of the dilutions referred to in claim 1 has properties which the undiluted diluent does not have. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
D13 does not disclose such a mirror. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:02 am by Jeremy Saland
Although it pains me to do so, the following is a cut and paste right from the decision and clearly analyzes when the police must be allowed in one’s home and when they can be denied: 1. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 6:02 am by Derek T. Muller
At the end, I aggregate them, weighing each 1/3 like USNWR does, to give an overall percentile total. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 11:57 pm by Madhulika Vishwanathan
 Does the controller have discretionary power in case of CL u/s 92? [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 10:45 am by FM Librarian
"Entrepreneurial Refugees and the City: Brief Encounters in Beirut," Journal of Refugee Studies, vol. 32, no. 1 (March 2019)- The postprint version of this article is currently under embargo. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Jon Gelman
Findings: Doses were accrued at very low rates (mean 1·1 mGy per year, SD 2·6). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 7:19 am by Debra A. McCurdy
The final rule will be published by August 1, 2015, and generally will apply to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2015. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
Decision T 65/96 does not help the appellant’s position, because in addition to the reference to previous statements, three specific points made in the decision under appeal were contested. [1.4] A further argument advanced by the appellant rests upon a passage in the decision T 644/97 [1] according to which an appellant cannot be compelled to come up with new arguments (“Indeed, a requirement that new arguments must be submitted to render an appeal admissible… [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:17 pm
So even if the medical record does not substantiate your complaints of pain the factors set out above will be considered to determine whether you are disabled because of pain. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:32 pm
The regulations contain a long list of restrictions to ensure that an early discharge does not endanger the health of mother or infant. [read post]