Search for: "Donald C. Grant" Results 181 - 200 of 630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Leaves to Appeal Granted Criminal Law: Dangerous Offenders; ConstitutionalityR. v. [read post]
Washington State and Minnesota Sue Administration to Void EO On January 30, 2017, the State of Washington filed in Seattle District Court  a complaint against Donald Trump, et al. seeking declaratory and injunctive relief invalidating portions of the EO barring foreign nationals and refugees entry into the U.S.:  generally EO Section 3(c); and Sections 5(a)-(c),(e). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 4:24 am
Faced with a 60% increase in asylum applications between 2006 and 2008, Bill C-11 imposed procedural bars on the asylum process. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 8:44 pm
 There is a good deal that these assertions simply gloss over, or take for granted. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 2:57 pm
 There is a good deal that these assertions simply gloss over, or take for granted. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
“Curry favour with Donald Trump'” by granting trade mark rights… seriously? [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Roberts ties them together with the following lament: “we have come to take democracy for granted, and civic education has fallen by the wayside. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:32 am by Raffaela Wakeman
The district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss all six claims and the plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their constitutional and ATS claims only. [read post]
Jan. 22, 2010)(per curiam) (grant of new trial after jury verdict requires explanation pursuant to recently established new precedent)IN RE UNITED SCAFFOLDING, INC.; from Jefferson County; 9th district (09-09-00098-CV, 287 SW3d 274, 04-16-09)Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oral argument, the Court conditionally grants the petition for writ of mandamus.Per Curiam OpinionJanuary 22, 2010: One Per Curiam Supreme Court of Texas Opinion… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:56 am by Scott Bomboy
“Under the fundamental rule that no one may be a judge in his own case, the President cannot pardon himself,” said Mary C. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It is now up to the courts—and to the extent that they have not been completely stripped of power, the voters of North Carolina—to prove that inference wrong.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Haley Proctor
The headline grabber for the week is the opinion in In re: Sealed Case, which revealed that Special Counsel Jack Smith subpoenaed Twitter’s records related to Donald Trump’s Twitter account. [read post]