Search for: "Douglas v. State of California"
Results 181 - 200
of 492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am
District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California’s ban on same-sex marriage, noting that although the Supreme Court later “chose to speak on gay marriage through a narrower case, ruling only that the federal government must recognize marriages solemnized under state law,” since then the lower courts “have been reading the [United States v.] [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. (1988) 216 Cal.App.3d 388, 421. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:21 pm
California (constitutional challenge to California sentencing guidelines) and Global Crossing v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:49 am
Case citation: Moule v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
American Medical News discussed Douglas v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
"Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is joined by California Supreme Court Justice Leondra Kruger for conversation inspired by his book, Who Decides? [read post]
10 May 2018, 12:19 pm
Discrimination Against the Chinese Justice Douglas focuses much of the entry in the Almanac to the 19th century racism through California. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
From People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
In Douglas v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” Other previews come from Jess Bravin and Douglas Belkin in The Wall Street Journal and Vinay Harpalani at ISCOTUSnow, while in the San Jose Mercury News Howard Mintz discusses what the case might mean for California’s Proposition 209, that state’s seventeen-year-old ban on affirmative action. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
Writing at ACSblog, Rochelle Bobroff previews Monday’s arguments in Douglas v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in the case of People of the State of California and the City of San Diego v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 11:49 am
Any Disputes shall be resolved by final and binding arbitration under the rules and auspices of the American Arbitration Association, to be held in San Francisco, California, in English, with a written decision stating legal reasoning issued by the arbitrator(s) at either party’s request, and with arbitration costs and reasonable documented attorneys’ costs of both parties to be borne by the party that ultimately loses. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 10:58 am
–State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:40 pm
Merrick‘s analysis was predicated on the familiar McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting framework—which the Court held applied to state law discrimination claims under FEHA just as it would to federal Title VII claims—and thus has implications for any claims in federal court analyzed under that framework. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:40 pm
Merrick‘s analysis was predicated on the familiar McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting framework—which the Court held applied to state law discrimination claims under FEHA just as it would to federal Title VII claims—and thus has implications for any claims in federal court analyzed under that framework. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:59 am
This evidence was sufficient to carry their minimal burden at step one of the McDonnell Douglas framework. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:59 pm
” State v. [read post]
