Search for: "Downing v. Howard" Results 181 - 200 of 908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Gene Editing Judith Daar, University of California Irvine School of Law, Human Germline Genome Editing: Dilemmas in Informed Consent Eileen Kane, Penn State Law, A Volatile Year in Human Genome Editing Myrisha Lewis, Howard University School of Law, The Coming Age of Gene Editing: Medical Promise, Regulation, and the Revival of Decades of Debate Maxwell Mehlman, Case Western Reserve University, Regulating Do-It-Yourself Gene Editing C. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
The Relevance and Admissibility of Rezoning and Comparable Sales Occurring After the Date of Taking, When Determining the Value of Condemned Property by Alan T. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
For Capitol Media Services (via Tucson.com), Howard Fischer reports that this week’s ruling against an Arizona fire district, Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Ilya Somin
The expert near-consensus on this subject is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
All attempts to create one have been howled down, the loudest and crudest voices belonging to Murdoch’s lieutenants. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
This sort of gag order is a pretty clear First Amendment violation, much like in the McCauley v. [read post]