Search for: "Downloader 88"
Results 181 - 200
of 388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In T 1440/08 [4] the board also held that it had the power to examine an amendment under A 84 in line with other decisions of the existing jurisprudence (see T 472/88; T 420/00; T 681/00), in particular when the combination of granted claims led to an inconsistency between two features of the amended claim 1. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The present appeal concerns a decision of the Receiving Section (RS) of the EPO, dispatched on 22 December 2010, refusing the applicant’s requests that the invitation to remedy deficiencies pursuant to R 30(3) be withdrawn and the late furnishing fee refunded. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
This is an examination appeal.During the examination proceedings, the Examining Division (ED) objected in a first communication dated 29 September 2008 to the claims on file. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
According to opinion G 2/88 [3.3] a distinction is to be made between the protection conferred by a patent as determined by the claims according to A 69(1) and the rights conferred on the patent owner in the designated Contracting States according to A 64. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
T 251/88 or T 1700/10)In this context the Board wishes to point out that the ED is not entitled (es steht ihr nicht zu) to make statements falling within the competence of the Board, such as reimbursement of the appeal fee and remittal to the ED.Reimbursement of the appeal fee (R 103(1)(a))As the Board has established above (point [1.4]) such a substantial procedural violation has been committed here; it is necessary to set aside the decision. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 11:01 am
T 283/88 [4]). [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
A process for removing nitrogen oxides from flue gas issuing from a regenerator of a fluidized catalytic cracking unit wherein the flue gas is cleaned of substantial amounts of dust in the regenerator, the process comprising the steps of:a) directing the flue gas into a tertiary cyclone separator and separating the solids therefrom so that not more than 250mg/Nm3 of solids exit in an overflow from the tertiary cyclone separator and causing between 0.5% and 6% percentage of flue gas entering the… [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
T 27/94 [2]; T 378/88 [4]) there is no case of res judicata. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:32 pm
Podcast here#88. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:32 pm
Podcast here#88. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:32 pm
Podcast here#88. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:32 pm
Podcast here#88. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:37 pm
filename=E-88-48.pdf 4. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:54 am
With the start of the school year less than two weeks away, the Canadian education community is increasingly thinking about copyright and the implications of Bill C-11 and the Supreme Court of Canada's five copyright decisions. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
However, decision G 2/88 [10.1] states: “Under A 54(2) EPC the question to be decided is what has been “made available” to the public: the question is not what may have been “inherent” in what was made available”. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:10 am
Android & iOS users account for 88% of total mobile owners who have downloaded an app in the past 30 days. [read post]
