Search for: "Downloader 93" Results 181 - 200 of 435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
T 836/01 and T 1642/06, on claims relating to second or further medical uses of a known substance and which acknowledged novelty in the case at issue based on the differentiation of a direct and indirect effect.[12] In view of the foregoing, the board is satisfied that the subject-matter of claim 1 at issue fulfils the requirements of A 54(1) and A 54(3) vis-à-vis the disclosure in document D1.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be… [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Both the opponent and the company affiliated to it were interested in presenting the object disputed in T 292/93 to potential customers. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In G 1/93 the role of A 69(1) is also considered and it is concluded that the description is to be used for assessing in particular sufficiency of disclosure and in determining the scope of protection conferred by the claims. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
EBA member Fiona suddenly felt that a broccoli would cast a shadow on her holidaysThe present case was the one who gave rise to the “Broccoli” decision G 2/07 of the EBA of appeal (EBA) on how the expression “essentially biological” was to be understood.When summoned to oral proceedings (OPs), the patent proprietor replaced all its requests on file. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The opponent does not have to have any special interest in challenging the patent: G 1/84 and T 798/93. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus T 836/01 is irrelevant for the present case, too.[35] The Board is of the opinion that the present case rather compares to the situation dealt with in decision T 254/93, which was later followed by the Boards in decisions T 669/01 and T 486/01. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
T 861/93 [5-6] and T 28/93 [4.1]). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:00 am by Dianne Saxe
 7, 8, 43, 93, 97, 99, 150, 190(1); Pesticides Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 5:48 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Over the years, the tax has looked like this (IRS report downloads as a pdf): The federal gas tax has remained steady at 18.4 cents per gallon for the last 16 years. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 12:09 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Carrier, Two Puzzles Resolved: Of The Schumpeter-Arrow Stalemate and Pharmaceutical Innovation Markets, 93 Iowa L. [read post]
30 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The duty to exercise all due care applies first and foremost to the applicant for re-establishment and then, by virtue of the delegation implicit in his appointment, to the professional representative authorized to represent the applicant before the EPO: J 3/93 [2.1].[5] Where a loss of rights results from some error in a party’s failure to implement its intention to comply with a time limit, it is sufficient to show that the failure is due to exceptional circumstances or that it… [read post]
29 May 2013, 2:27 am
Download the financial statements Nova Group’s directors wouldn’t make public. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Reference was also made to decisions T 793/93 and T 204/00 as cited in the Case Law, 6th edition, 2010, page 560.The board, however, cannot agree with the above arguments. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Normally I do not present decisions of the Disciplinary Board, but I found this one quite entertaining.The appeal was filed by a candidate who had failed the EQE 2009 after having been awarded the following marks: A: 49; B: 55; C: 39; D: 57.*** Translation of the German original ***[2.1] The appellant pointed out that the (fictitious) client’s letter on which paper A was based clearly and unambiguously indicated that the client did not desire to obtain patent protection for the process using… [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is an appeal against the revocation of the opposed patent. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 4:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
For more information, please download a comprehensive summary of employment statistics (PDF). [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
When sloppy drafting meets thoughtless amendments, the outcome may be deadly.The appeal was against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to revoke the patent for lack of novelty.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:A cartridge (1) for use in a beverage preparation machine, the cartridge containing one or more beverage ingredients (200) and being formed from substantially air- and water-impermeable materials, wherein the one or more beverage ingredients is a liquid chocolate… [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:20 am by Lorraine Fleck
Robert Morgenthau 93 & still crusading for justice | Even at 93, He Finds a Case Too Important to Pass Up http://ow.ly/iXEgW  Possible Canadian artists resale royalty? [read post]