Search for: "Downs v. Department of Public Welfare" Results 181 - 200 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm by Laurence Tribe
Department of Public Health: “Marriage [] bestows enormous private and social advantages on those who choose to marry. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School… [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
Boiled down, all the statutory presumption says is that some (unspecified) involvement is in a child’s best interests (unless it’s not). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 11:21 am by David
  In Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
Waiver programs are not well publicized and are not Beckett waiver, but many do not know it exists. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 22 March 2023, judgement was handed down in the case of Kerslake v Sunol (Discrimination) [2023] ACAT 18, in favour of the applicant. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am by Eric Turkewitz
That’s right, the public does in the form of tax dollars going to various welfare and Medicaid programs. [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:31 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Third Circuit’s decision in Glaxo is distinguishable from the Ninth Circuit’s position on a similar issue in Parra v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
It deserves, as Lawrence Herman, the former head of the Economic and Treaty Law Section of Canada’s External Affairs Department, pointed out, “careful, reasoned and balanced assessment”. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm by Henry Miller
Although courts have not employed the nondelegation doctrine to strike down a regulation since the New Deal era, Nevitt points to Justice Neil Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
Of course, where you come down this issue probably depends on whether you believe Dr. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The names of councils that seize children from their parents should also be kept from the public, Sir Andrew McFarlane said in instructions passed down to the courts. [read post]