Search for: "Dress for Less, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2016, 8:20 am by Dennis Crouch
” CCIA: [SamsungCCIA]  Although less-so than PK and EFF, the CCIA is a fairly consistent “anti-patent” organization. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm by Ron Coleman
Unfortunately for Mars (not the god of war — the maker of M&M’s) and codefendant Chute Gerdeman, Inc. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:36 pm by MBettman
“A pre-marketing warning claim is not a dress rehearsal for a post-marketing warning claim. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:08 am
The reason is that such dress might well be changed at any time; only the word mark itself is to be registered. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:21 am by Tim Sitzmann
Inc. clarified that product configuration marks can never be inherently distinctive. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:10 pm by Jeremy
A, the owner of Boo whose name is anonymised in the judgement, established Buddy Boo Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Hopkins, are less surprising. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:41 pm by Ken White
Activision, Inc.: Soldier of Fortune (assassination, race war). 9. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
There's definitely something wrong ...The IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 relating to silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here, and this Kat here). [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
In short, ConvaTec's patent was a method of making light-stabilised silverised antimicrobial materials for the silverisation of gel-forming fibres in wound dressings. [read post]