Search for: "Duck v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2012, 11:22 am
Super Duck Tours * Broad Matching Doesn't Violate Injunction--Rhino Sports v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which applies to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits the use of excessive force by policemen in the course of an arrest, see, e.g., Graham v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:55 am
[Beck] Reform of lame-duck sessions? [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
” At frESH, Danelle Gagliardi and Matthew Rojas analyze Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
" Publicly distributed in turn meant that the communication “[c]an be received by 50,000 or more persons in a State where a primary election . . . is being held within 30 days. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:06 am
United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:50 am
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:11 am
" As Alito notes, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:42 pm
The New York State Court Appeals heard oral arguments today in Goldstein v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:47 am
Del. 2007); Zhang v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:01 am
In an unpublished decision today, United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 9:59 am
Circuit ruled in al Bahlul v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:12 am
In a case called United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that were not… [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 12:27 pm
Circuit's decision this Wednesday in Kiyemba v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 3:00 am
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113 v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:45 am
v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:37 am
In the case of CICAD v Switzerland (Judgment of 7 June 2016)(French only), the Third Section of the Court of Human Rights held that a judgment finding that an accusation of anti-semitism made by the applicant was unlawful did not violate Article 10. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
