Search for: "Duke v. SUPERIOR COURT"
Results 181 - 200
of 221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 6:49 am
The BCC moved forward with the proposed rule anyway, and now our L.A. marijuana delivery attorneys are monitoring the situation, as cities appear poised to duke it out in court. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:58 am
Mazza v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm
European Court of Human RightsGawlik v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
Supreme Court has held in a widely respected opinion, NCAA v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
Supreme Court has held in a widely respected opinion, NCAA v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Mattel argued that the list of examples in the contract were illustrative not exclusive, but the Court held that "ideas" are "markedly different from the list of examples including discoveries, improvements and designs" (People ex rel Lungren v superior Court (1996)). [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 5:21 pm
Superior Court Judge Corey Cramin granted summary judgment to Blue Shield and awarded the company $104,194 in damages. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:01 am
As usual in class actions, the battleground was over Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b) (23(b)(3), that is, rather than 23(b)(2), at issue in Dukes v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:13 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Razzano v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:52 am
Arguably, it is inconsistent with the prohibition on Trial by Formula discussed in Dukes v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Ren Ventures argued that it has superior trademark rights due to its use and registration of SABACC. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:29 am
” For whatever reasons, it seems that both sides preferred to duke it out in court rather than arbitrate, as evidenced on respondent’s side by his brief in which he argued lack-of-standing secondary to his argument on the merits that no deadlock existed, and gave the duty to arbitrate an even lower ranking. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) As anticipated, today the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Last Week in the Courts Fancourt J heard closing submissions in the trial of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
Ins. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:24 pm
But the court went on to say that under Dukes the class would have failed “commonality” for these same reasons. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
At Scotusblog, Timothy Coates concluded the following: “The Court’s questions indicate that this case may turn less on the niceties of the common law than the realities of common practice in the criminal courts. [read post]
