Search for: "Durham v. Durham"
Results 181 - 200
of 625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2007, 9:00 am
need for continual training of young prosecutors in dealing with pressGoodenow: criminal defendant has a right to be tried in the courtroom, and the media doesn't have a right to try themclear that three falsely accused students were not presumed innocent by mediamedia and public have right to access to the courts--not to everything dealing with caseConnolly: most prosecutors do follow the ruleslesson of Nifong is that not everybody plays by those rules--could see this through… [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:28 am
The facts of the second case cited by the Durham attorneys, Francis v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012) Maidment v… [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
Although disclaiming any interest in the outcome of the claims underlying the dispute, NASAA filed a joint amicus brief with the North Carolina Secretary of State, arguing that the case’s foundational jurisdiction issues directly implicate the Secretary of State’s ability to enforce the North Carolina Securities Act (NNN Durham Office Portfolio 1, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:30 am
¶9 (quoting Blackwell’s Durham Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:24 am
September 12, 2023 - 11 AM: Montgomery Law LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:39 am
Roland v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
In a 1984 case, North Carolina v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 4:14 am
The highly informative April 2022 quarterly report of the North Carolina Office of Counsel summarizes a number of matters at various stages of the disciplinary process, including Nikita V. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:43 am
’ The cases re-written in the volume includes: Re G (Children), Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge (No 2), R v Brown, YL v Birmingham City Council and Others and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:40 am
The symposium will assess the implications of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Glossip v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:55 pm
” Durham, 445 F.3d at 1251. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm
In a ground-breaking decision in Brown v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:34 pm
” Durham, 445 F.3d at 1251. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel UK Ltd and Excess… [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:15 am
” [@clickbaitSCOTUS on Ocasio v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 pm
” narrative from that last paragraph, but I figure I’ve learned enough about how not to run the Durham branch that I think we can make a second office work. 😂 “Wait, did you say ‘we’? [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:53 am
To that point, the Supreme Court of Georgia recently reversed a lower court ruling regarding superseding acts in Jordan v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 8:23 am
It seems that the Berkeley, CA firm of Cobalt LLP posted a story on their "News" section of their website/blog about the Utah case of Wilcox v. [read post]
