Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 181 - 200 of 4,058
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 3:21 am by Matrix Law
The Standard of Professional Behaviour in the 2008 and 2012 Police (Conduct) Regulations does not expressly state whether the criminal law test or the civil law test applies in police disciplinary proceedings in relation to the use of force. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ has been appointed as a Judicial Commissioner of the Judicial Appointments Commission, the independent body responsible for the selection of candidates for judicial office in tribunals and courts in England and Wales. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm by Frank Cranmer
The Parliament website now states that the Bill has been withdrawn. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am by Jan von Hein
Waterkotte: Provisional injunctions under unfair competition law The Higher Regional Court of Hamburg addressed the delimitation between Art. 7(1) and (2) of the Brussels Ibis Regulation after Wikingerhof v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Is a product put on the market before the date of filing of a European patent application to be excluded from the state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC for the sole reason that its composition or internal structure could not be analysed and reproduced without undue burden by the skilled person before that date? [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 23. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Albert W. Alschuler
Although 17th, 18th, and 19th-century governments didn’t forbid firearm possession by felons, they did disarm other people, including Catholics (not only in England but also in Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania), people who refused to swear loyalty to their states during the American Revolution, Native Americans, and Black people, both enslaved and free. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Pennsylvanians, New Yorkers, and New Englanders were no strangers to the constitutional technology Fritz calls ‘interposition,’ and he narrates in meticulous detail the many occasions on which states above the Mason-Dixon line participated in challenges to federal laws. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]