Search for: "EVANS v. PAGE" Results 181 - 200 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG)   United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:06 am by INFORRM
  In this respect the Judge relied upon Lion Laboratories Ltd v Evans [1985] 1 QB 526 as establishing that there is no rule that it is necessary to demonstrate iniquity in order to justify a breach of confidence and that a balancing exercise falls to be performed on the facts. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Court noted the famous words of Lord Atkins in Evans v Bartlam [1937] AC 473, [1937] 2 All ER 646, at page 479: The fact is that there is not and never has been a presumption that every one knows the law. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  The basis of Mr Stenson’s plea was that his co-conspirators were Andy Coulson and Dan Evans. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 12:49 pm by Florian Mueller
I had a brief conversation with a senior German judge who wasn't personally presiding over the German Motorola v. [read post]
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]