Search for: "Elkins v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2010, 11:23 am
Earlier: Vinson & Elkins Raises & Bonuses: New York Happy, Texas Sad Vinson & Elkins - New York - United States - Law - Houston [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:08 am
We've got a tale of two states when it comes to the Vinson & Elkins bonus. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 3:38 am
At issue in the latest edition of State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 5:47 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 9 (1968); Elkins v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:31 pm
Earlier: Bad News for Laid Off Associates: Your Résumés Are Not Welcome Vinson & Elkins: Another 'No Layoff" Promise Sponsored Topics: Vinson & Elkins - Columbia Law School - New York - United States - Law [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:09 am
Elkins v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:47 am
The “sanctity of the home” case is Hunsberger v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
Elkins v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
Vinson & Elkins partner Ron Kirk--a former mayor of Dallas--leads the list of contenders for secretary of transportation. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:13 am
See: United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Vinson & Elkins, 859 S.W.2d 617, 624 n. 5 (Tex. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:25 pm
§ 1101(a)(15)(F), (G); Elkins v. [read post]
OH11: Judicial intergrity justifies exclusion; warrantless entry for noise complaint was unjustified
10 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:35 am
A test was stated in Matter of Elkins, 14 Ed Dept Repts 193, to the effect that if more than one-half of the functions to be performed by the incumbent of the new position are those which he performed in his old position, the positions are similar. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:30 pm
[v] Elkin Abramowitz and Peter Scher, The Hyde Amendment: Congress Creates a Toehold for Wrongful Prosecution, 22 Champion 22 (1998). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:53 am
See, for instance, Hamilton's famous argument in Rutgers v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
" Gordon Mack Elkins v. [read post]
