Search for: "Emanuel v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
Actually, it pales by comparison.By coincidence, Marvell's lead counsel, Quinn Emanuel's Kevin Johnson, was also on Samsung's team in the Apple trial. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by Florian Mueller
Let me quote two paragraphs from one of Judge Koh's claim construction orders in Apple v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:45 am by David Kemp
Self-described as the “largest [law firm] in the United States devoted solely to business litigation,” the firm recently made headlines as being counsel for Samsung in the much-watched Samsung v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:45 am by David Kemp
Self-described as the “largest [law firm] in the United States devoted solely to business litigation,” the firm recently made headlines as being counsel for Samsung in the much-watched Samsung v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:20 pm by Charles Johnson
  Like these other states, Texas no long utilizes the term “rape” in its Penal Code. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:21 am by Carlos A. Kelly
In 2006, the Florida Legislature enacted several statutes in response to the United States Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:26 am by Florian Mueller
It was filed by Quinn Emanuel, the law firm that previously represented Motorola Mobility in most of its lawsuits with Apple. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
And long before Emanuel assumed office, Chicago could already have staked a strong claim to being the nation’s most “immigrant-friendly” city, and Illinois to being its most immigrant-friendly state. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:36 am by Peter Vickery
On May 8, the Supreme Judicial Court heard arguments in Temple Emanuel of Newton v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Well, that was an interesting set of perspectives; since I was already in a snarky mood, I couldn’t help but think in response to Kappos about what a lawyer might have said pre-NYT v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Richard Renner
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which applies to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits the use of excessive force by policemen in the course of an arrest, see, e.g., Graham v. [read post]