Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,591
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
Antitrust Matters provides engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:58 am
Our international dispute resolution lawyers are handling a case right now (so I cannot discuss it other than very broadly) that caused us to review a case, Phillips v Audio Active Ltd., 494 F.3d 378 (2d Cir. 2007), where the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (this is one level down from the US Supreme Court) held that a contractual provision stating that proceedings “are to be brought in England” meant England was an “obligatory… [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm
ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5 This was the seminal privacy case of the year, decided by the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
The First, Fourth, and Seventh Circuits have concluded that a website is a place of public accommodation.[7] The Third, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits have held that a website is a place of public accommodation, but only if it has a close nexus to a physical place of business.[8] District courts in the Second Circuit have provided contradicting rulings.[9] The Eleventh Circuit recently ruled that a website is not a place of public accommodation, but then later vacated… [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 4:13 pm
Vardy v. [read post]
Recent Hague Convention District Court Cases - Esparza v Nares, 2022 WL 17724414 ( S.D. Texas, 2022)
20 Dec 2022, 7:42 am
England v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:12 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 19/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Canada… [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
While the decision of Morgan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
" As Judge Posner put it in Moore v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
"Do your job," as New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick famously said. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:53 am
England, 115 N.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
Lord Briggs concluded: “In my view therefore this court should firmly reject the theory that the aim of the remedy for proprietary estoppel is detriment-based forms any part of the law of England. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 8:28 am
England v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Even setting aside Bush v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 3:06 pm
” In Community Financial Services v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:35 am
Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd, heard 8th November 2022 R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales, heard 9th November 2022 News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 22nd November 2022 R (on the application of Maguire) v His Majesty’s Senior Coroner… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:00 am
This means that a State cannot fully benefit from the advantages of the Convention by simply copying the rules of the Convention into its own legislation, or by relying on such rules on grounds of judicial discretion (as it occurs in the Netherlands and to a large extent in England and Wales), but should rather become a party to it. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 8:47 am
Accessed November 1, 2022. https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/6b0efb70-cdbb-9c8e-e040-e00a18065a96 In the 1854 case, O’Reilly et al. v. [read post]
