Search for: "Epstein v. Epstein" Results 181 - 200 of 1,245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice and the defendants were entitled to dismissal of that cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d at 909; Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d at 728). [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am by Chris Seaton
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the Appellate Division held that the Plaintiff's breach of contract claims against the New York City Department of Education [DOE] was properly dismissed for failure to serve a notice of claim within three months of claim accrual, citing Fifty CPW Tenants Corp. v Epstein, 16 AD3d 292, the court further observed that these breach of contract claims against DOE were all related to Plaintiff's termination. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the Appellate Division held that the Plaintiff's breach of contract claims against the New York City Department of Education [DOE] was properly dismissed for failure to serve a notice of claim within three months of claim accrual, citing Fifty CPW Tenants Corp. v Epstein, 16 AD3d 292, the court further observed that these breach of contract claims against DOE were all related to Plaintiff's termination. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:45 am by James Romoser
Collins) Respect Jurors (Francis Miles, American Constitution Society) Religious Liberty Should Prevail (Richard Epstein, Ricochet) Pack the Court: A Dose of Therapeutics for the Current Malaise (Martin London, New York Law Journal) Why Walmart should sell booze in Texas (Dallas Morning News editorial on pending cert petition in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” These allegations are conclusory and lack any factual support, and they are inadequate to sufficiently allege that the stipulation of settlement that the plaintiff entered into with his former wife was “effectively compelled” by the mistakes of counsel (Rau v Borenkoff, 262 AD2d 388, 389; see Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d 726, 728). [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:30 am by Joy
Debates Whether a Veggie Burger Is Really a BurgerMatthews v Ocean Nutrition: Departed employee awarded $1M bonus from company’s sale during notice periodTrudeau government pressed to shield secret operational information in court- Garry J. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 11:21 am by Samuel Bray
Our brief urges the Court to finish the work it started in Jones v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:50 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
” These allegations are conclusory and lack any factual support, and they are inadequate to sufficiently allege that the stipulation of settlement that the plaintiff entered into with his former wife was “effectively compelled” by the mistakes of counsel (Rau v Borenkoff, 262 AD2d 388, 389; see Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d 726, 728). [read post]