Search for: "Evens v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 181 - 200
of 514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
In our schools, our newsrooms, even our corporate boardrooms, there is a new far-left fascism that demands absolute allegiance. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 7:11 am
Nyanzi v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
Koppelman accuses me of being too forgiving of the civil rights commissioner in Masterpiece and of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:25 am
The council says that what went wrong was that it does not have enough housing resources to meet the needs of even its top priority tenants any faster. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
(This op-ed was first published in Just Security on April 13, 2020.) [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Data collected by innovative organizations has enormous value and is and can be used to vastly improve our country and its citizens’ economic, social, and personal health, among other things. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Data collected by innovative organizations has enormous value and is and can be used to vastly improve our country and its citizens’ economic, social, and personal health, among other things. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Friday announced the deal with the Trump administration for an aid package from Congress that would provide free tests even for the uninsured, enhanced unemployment benefits by boosting food stamps, and federal funds for Medicaid. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
Two commissioners also provided some colorful social media commentary on the vote. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Can be liable for misleading interpretation even though a nonmisleading interpretation is possible. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
In other words, even though Seagal (or apparently, his lawyers) likely never even heard of Section 17(b), Seagal could still violate 17(b) nonetheless. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
A previous blog post reported that congressional Democrats are urging Social Security Commissioner Andrew Saul to withdraw a proposed rule that would allow Administrative Appeals Judges (AAJs) to conduct retirement and disability hearings in place of some Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) even though the AAJs do not have the same experience and qualifications as ALJs. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
And in her view, the Social Security Administration is even more powerful and ubiquitous than the CFPB. [read post]
