Search for: "Ex Parte Reed" Results 181 - 200 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm by Steve Bainbridge
" I've heard of tough teachers before, whose classes caused grown men to weep and ex-marines to blanch, but I've never heard of a terrifying review session before. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm by Adam Thierer
  Section 202 goes further by, among other means, proscribing common carriers from “unreasonable discrimination in charges, practices, classifications, regulations, facilities, or services…” Similar language can be found in the six Net Neutrality principles proposed by the FCC as part of its Open Internet / Net Neutrality Proceeding.[11] The Court of Appeals in Comcast v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:47 am
All the more so when it comes to the former constituency of ex-Liberal leader Jeremy Thorpe. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:55 am by Erin Miller
Reed (09-559) – petitioners’ brief Friday, February 26: Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:31 am by Steve Hall
Part two of Brandi Grissom's examination of the Hank Skinner is at the Texas Tribune today. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Rev. 2550, 2550 (June 2001).AlabamaEx parte Household Retail Services, Inc., 744 So.2d 871, 880 n. 2 (Ala. 1999); Ex parte Exxon Corp., 725 So.2d 930, 933 n.3 (Ala. 1998).AlaskaWe didn’t find anything useful along these lines under Alaska law.ArizonaOsuna v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 6:10 pm
One of the stories Carroll told me was that Reed stole the song "Sweet Jane" from him, and that was a part of why they were no longer on speaking terms. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:02 am
They also note that Ferguson filed ex parte sealed motions seeking to hide one defendant's cooperation with prosecutors and another's change of plea until after Shelnutt's trial. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:42 am
The Second Circuit, relying on a federal court's supervisory powers over the administration of criminal justice, held that due process required a court to divest itself of jurisdiction over the person of a defendant where it had been acquired as a result of the government's "deliberate, unnecessary and unreasonable invasion of the accused's constitutional rights".[10] The Toscanino holding was later narrowed and clarified by the Second Circuit in United States ex… [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
You can read the underlying opinion here.PD-1047-08, Ex parte Jason Wayne Hunter, an aggravated sexual assault case out of Titus County.The State's opening argument. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 6:34 am
Just as important, any new parts of the Army Field Manual must also comply with Common Article 3, meaning that no new techniques involving torture or cruel and inhumane treatment can be placed in a secret appendix to the Army Field Manual. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 9:20 am
Ex: u can read @guykawasaki ppt on innovation, but watching him give it completely diff. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, December 15, 2008 US v Haygood, No. 07-1771 A guilty plea conviction and sentence relating to defendant's possession of marijuana and firearms that police found in his home during the execution of a search warrant is affirmed in part as to the conviction, but the sentence is vacated and remanded where the district court erred when defendant was deprived of the right of allocution at sentencing. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:55 pm
Idaho native and former Clinton domestic policy advisor Bruce Reed, a genuine Democratic centrist who seems, alas, unlikely to have a big place in the New Obama Order, has written the very best thing about why Democrats run a big risk in condescending to her. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:53 pm
First, it established a three-part test to determine whether an indirect compensation arrangement exists; if an indirect compensation arrangement is not found to exist because of the application of the test, the Stark Law referral prohibition would be inapplicable. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
McBride, No. 06-7550 Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed in part where petitioner was not denied the effective assistance of counsel, but vacated where the state circuit court contravened his Sixth Amendment confrontation right by applying a per se rule restricting cross-examination of the prosecution's expert under a rape shield law. [read post]