Search for: "FEDEX GROUND "
Results 181 - 200
of 365
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2014, 2:15 pm
Here's the issue in a nutshell: FedEx thinks its Ground drivers are independent contractors and the drivers generally disagree. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. 8/27/14), the Court held that the same result applies under the "economic realities" test. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., ___ F. 3d. ___ (9th Cir. 8/27/14), individuals who drove delivery routes for FedEx Ground and FedEx Home (FedEx) in California sued for unpaid wages, reimbursement of business expenses, and violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), alleging that they were employees, rather than independent contractors. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:47 am
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 457 F.3d 675 (7th Cir. 2006). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:53 am
FedEx Ground Package Sys. (8/27/14), the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that FedEx’s delivery drivers are employees of the company, not independent contractors. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:32 am
” On those grounds, FedEx workers are employees. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 8:16 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, concluding as a matter of law that FedEx Ground had misclassified over 2,300 drivers in California and … Continue reading → [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 8:52 am
FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 6:44 am
FedEx Ground has been at the epicenter of the crackdown on IC misclassification by government regulators, state legislators, and plaintiffs’ class action lawyers since 2007, when a California appellate court found single-route FedEx Ground delivery drivers to have been misclassified … Continue reading → [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:38 am
FedEx Ground... [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 5:08 am
FedEx moved for reconsideration based on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
As I fill the backlog, we have yet another big decision from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:46 am
Finding the facts here quite similar to the plaintiffs in Estrada v FedEx Ground Package Sys, in which a state appeals court held drivers were employees under state law, the Ninth Circuit reinstated the drivers’ state-law causes of action alleging failure to pay sick leave and other wage-related claims (Ruiz v Affinity Logistics Corp, June 16, 2014, Pregerson, H). [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 1:50 pm
Most of the individuals who died were found on the ground in front of the bus or in the front part of the bus. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:38 pm
Miller named 500 Festival and FedEx as defendants. 500 Festival and FedEx defended on Section 230 grounds. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:01 pm
141 drivers classified as independent contractors by FedEx Ground will receive $5.8 million in settlement of their misclassification lawsuit brought under federal and Maine wage and hour laws. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 6:27 am
The proposed incentive awards were reasonable given the commitment and efforts of those individuals and the workplace risk and awkwardness they incurred in doing so (Scovil v FedEx Ground Package System, Inc dba FedEx Home Delivery, March 14, 2014, Hornby, D). [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Gives them the moral high ground, erases Chevron deference. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:38 am
In the district court’s opinion, the question of whether business expenses and deductions borne by employees are recoverable under the Wage Act is unsettled under state law (Schwann v FedEx Ground Package System, Inc, February 7, 2014, Stearns, R). [read post]
