Search for: "Fells v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 8,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am by Charon QC
Lord Justice Aiken, agreeing that the appeal should be dismissed stated ” As Waller LJ has stated, S owed the appellant a duty of care. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 5:54 am by Jon Robinson
Yesterday the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) issued a summary disposition in Lemelle v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:10 am
Twelve year old prior conviction was inadmissible simply because probation period fell within ten years under FRE 609(b); circuit notes open issue on whether a revocation of probation or parole on the underlying conviction may stop the ten-year clock, in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in TC Heartland v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:23 am by sally
The costs relating to an exequatur (enforcement) procedure brought in one member state, in the course of which the recognition and enforcement was sought of a judgment given in another member state in proceedings seeking to enforce an intellectual property right, fell within article 14 of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/48/EC of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (OJ 2004 L 157, p 45).” WLR Daily, 18th December 2011 Source:… [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Pool Offshore, Inc., 182 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1999) was still good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Eric
" This is at least the second time a state's highest court has split 4-3 on a 230 case--the old Doe v. [read post]