Search for: "Files v. King et al" Results 181 - 200 of 320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2012, 9:01 am by Andrew P. MacArthur
Speakeasy, Inc., et al., the Second Circuit held that a provision to not challenge validity entered into prior to litigation, but after an accusation of infringement is void under Lear. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:35 am by Dennis Crouch
Mark Lemley filed a brief on behalf of Powell Books, et al. that runs in parallel with a brief filed by a group of art museums. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
  The evidence showed that from 1996 through September 2000, Edwards, the founder of ETS Payphones, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
If you’d like to contribute a transcript, send it to Bexis or McConnell, since we’re keeping the master file here, now. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:31 am by Kevin
Pope Benedict XVI, et al., filed in 2008 and bitching about the seizure of plaintiff's assets by Pope Clement V, a mere 701 years before. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of United Retired Firefighters Association and The American Legion Department of CaliforniaAmicus brief of Foundation for Moral LawAmicus brief of American Center for Law and Justice et al.Amicus brief of Texas et al.Amicus brief of David EpsteinAmicus brief of Family Research Council et al.Amicus brief of Rear Admiral Jeremiah Denton, USN (Ret.) et al.Motion of Pacific Justice Institute to withdraw motion to… [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:49 am
LLC et al., in Federal District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Malen & Associates, PC argued tenaciously on a motion to dismiss to limit King's reach, to no avail. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:49 am
LLC et al., in Federal District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Malen & Associates, PC argued tenaciously on a motion to dismiss to limit King's reach, to no avail. [read post]