Search for: "Fix v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 9,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Last October, I wrote a long post on a new Tenth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:35 am by sally
Huet v Université de Bretagne Occidentale (Case C-251/11); [2012] WLR (D) 71 “National legislation which provided for conversion of fixed-term employment contracts into an employment contract of indefinite duration when the fixed-term employment contracts reached a certain duration did not have to require that the employment contract of indefinite duration reproduced in identical terms the principal clauses set out in the previous contract. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:20 pm
When, as here, Judges Berzon and Ikuta agree that circuit precedent is probably wrong, I suspect that you'll see a successful en banc call to fix the problem.It's one of those plethora of "what counts as moral turpitude under state law" cases, which determines whether we kick someone out of the country. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Elenis, of a First Amendment objection to state public accommodations laws that the Court avoided in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
“I fear the Court today is compounding its past error by trying to fix it in a totally different era. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:16 pm
Because I want that stuff sealed.Seems to me like something the Legislature might want to fix. [read post]
During the Federal Trade Commission’s April 28 open meeting, Commissioners utilized the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:08 pm
Due to litigation in a case that I filed in front of the New Jersey Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:29 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
  That is, after all, why the Framers included Article V that makes it difficult, but not impossible, to correct a flaw in the grand design. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Docket Navigator
As this Court previously stated, the use of the machine must be more than 'incidental use . . . to perform [a] mental process.'" Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. [read post]