Search for: "Floyd v. Floyd"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2012, 10:25 am
By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair Discovery under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is more restrictive than under Brady v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:16 pm
Tapia v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:05 am
FLOYD, App. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:02 am
In Neo v Anan Kasei([2019]EWCA Civ 1646) the Court of Appeal again considered the thorny issue of insufficiency, both the Kirin-Amgenand the Biogen kind. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:36 am
S v Floyd [2008] EWCA Civ 201 is a Court of Appeal case in which the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 is considered in relation to a mandatory Ground 8 possession claim by a private landlord. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 1:09 am
After a defeat at first instance, The London Taxi Company pursued the matter further into the Court of Appeal, who rendered their decision very recently.The case of The London Taxi Corporation Ltd (t/a the London Taxi Company) v Frazer-Nash Research Ltd dealt with, as mentioned above, EU and UK trademarks over the design of the London black taxi (EUTM 951871 and UKTM 2440659). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:17 am
The case is HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Baselines for Terry Stops In Floyd v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather, Jr. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
After residents of Floyd County, Kentucky sued NFC Mining, claiming the company damaged their homes, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London followed suit, literally. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 3:57 pm
Floyd v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
Bill Moyers' Journal on 4 Sept 09 had a debate of sorts between Trevor Potter and Floyd Abrams over issues surrounding Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:08 pm
In Lahr Mechanical, et al. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:07 am
Our piece examined a November 2011 decision by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Morales v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 11:07 am
Rule 702 Expert Testimony v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 12:50 am
In Wilcut v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:46 pm
Florida v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:50 am
Floyd v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:25 am
Over to Daniel:This Kat bears belated news of the most recent episode in the IPCom saga in the form of a decision from the Patents Court decision, handed down on 24 April 2015, in IPCom v HTC [IPCOM GmbH & Co Kg v HTC Europe Co Ltd & Ors [2015] EWHC 1034 (Pat) (24 April 2015)].The decision relates to the European Patent (UK) 1 841 268 belonging to IPCom; a divisional of the patent EP 1 186 189. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:33 pm
§ 3500], Brady v. [read post]
