Search for: "Floyd v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2009, 9:33 am
If, however, there is some doubt about whether the actual form of compound claimed would result from the described process, it needs to be determined whether following the process would inevitably arrive at the claimed compound.This was the situation in Leo Pharma v Sandoz EWCA Civ 1188, which was decided by Lords Justice Jacob and Patten yesterday (17 November), on appeal from Floyd J's decision in the High Court earlier this year ([2009] EWHC 996 (Pat)). [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 1:33 pm
Cases such as Bridges v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 9:00 pm
Lieutenant General Floyd Austin, Convening Authority, the United States Army & the United States, Appellees. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, with Lord Justice Floyd setting out the reasons with which Lord Justices Flaux and Patten agreed. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:53 am
Floyd LJ stated: First, and most importantly, Neurim and Flynn have, and have provided to the court, reasonably detailed forecasts of their expected sales revenues in Periods 1 and 2. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:32 am
We are happy to report that the court in the case, Arizona Broadcasters Association v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, which upheld the act. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:28 am
The named Defendants are the Creek Nation Principal Chief,James Floyd; the United States Department of the Interior (“DOI”); and the Hon. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Foreword: Buckley v. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 9:18 am
Court rulings, such as the landmark case of Frazier v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 2:38 pm
Now, under Watkins v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
Court of Appeal Before Jackson, Lloyd Jones and Floyd LJJ, [2013] EWCA Civ 616 (see here), the Home Secretary argued that the decision made Pham de facto stateless (with nationality but denied the protection which should go with it), but not de jure stateless (without nationality under the laws of any state) and therefore it did not make him stateless within the meaning of section 40(4) of the 1981 Act. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
June 12th is Loving Day, a holiday celebrating the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:20 am
Floyd v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:42 am
” As law professor Joanna Schwartz explains, Hope v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
Since the hearing for Warner-Lambert v Actavis in February (IPKat post here), there has been growing speculation as to how far the UK Supreme Court would adopt the EPO approach, or seek to limit the requirement for plausibility.The case in questionIn the Court of Appeal ([2016] EWCA Civ 1006), Lord Justice Floyd upheld the High Court decision that claims 1 and 3 of the patent were insufficient. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
The authority cited in support of this proposition is Pozzoli SPA v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, in which Jacob LJ stated at para 10: "I would add this about permission to appeal in patent cases generally. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:41 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court called a special session and heard oral arguments in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm
State v. [read post]
