Search for: "Flynn v. Flynn" Results 181 - 200 of 633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2020, 1:53 am by Sophie Corke
Reconciling competition and IP law must take incentives to innovate into account, such as in excessive pricing cases like Pfizer/Flynn, which Chris Stothers talked about earlier in the day. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am by Sophie Corke
Katherine Moggridge presenting Katherine Moggridge(Three New Square), who acted on behalf of appellants ICOS, discussed Actavis v ICOS, the most recent case in the UK Supreme Court to address obviousness. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am by Elliot Setzer
Circuit’s ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm by John Floyd
Attorneys (AUSAs) filed a Government’s Sentencing Memorandum in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This falls apart in other situations, such as Fox v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:43 am
Topics will include, amongst others: the implications of non-obviousness for follow-on medical innovation (e.g. drug repurposing) after the UK Supreme Court's 2019 decision in Actavis v ICOS; the current and future roles of competition law in controlling drug prices, including an update on Flynn and Pfizer; and the potential effect of Brexit on the trade of medical products. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:04 am
Topics will include, amongst others: the implications of non-obviousness for follow-on medical innovation (e.g. drug repurposing) after the UK Supreme Court's 2019 decision in Actavis v ICOS; the current and future roles of competition law in controlling drug prices, including an update on Flynn and Pfizer; and the potential effect of Brexit on the trade of medical products. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 7:26 am by Hannah Kris
Courts of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 1:00 am by CAFE
Marco Rubio’s tweet about Bolton’s testimony, 1/6/20 United States’ Supplemental Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing, U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:20 am by Hannah Kris
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]