Search for: "Fox v Mark" Results 181 - 200 of 827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2019, 6:46 am by Florian Mueller
" (emphasis added)The market-driven and reality-centric solution to the problems I just outlined would be exactly what the FTC proposed in its opening statement in the FTC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons elaborates on the implications of Rucho v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm by Jon Levitan
Common Cause, which was consolidated with Lamone v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:26 am
As a result, condition (v) was deemed satisfied.Turning to likelihood of confusion (condition (vi)), the court recalled that this requires a global appreciation, taking into account all relevant factors, and must be undertaken from the perspective of the average consumer (see Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41).Benefit submitted that no such likelihood of confusion would subsist because of case law (notably Nestle… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
As the majority points out, the graves of those who died in WWI were marked with either a cross or a star of David. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
§ 11:32 (3d ed. 2018) is cited in the following article: Dina Ljekperic, Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a first-hand account of yesterday’s opinion announcements for this blog. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:29 pm by Andrew Hamm
” The post Afternoon round-up: Oral argument in <em>Department of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Malpractice and Tort Law Marc Ginsberg, The John Marshall Law School (Chicago), Cross-Disciplinary Expert Testimony In Medical Negligence Litigation Mark Hall, Wake Forest University, The Restatement (Third) of Medical Liability Michelle Mello, Stanford University, Practice Changes Among Medical Malpractice "Frequent Flyers" Alix Rogers, Stanford Law School, Neither Property Nor Tort: The Curious Case of Quasi-Property of Human Bodily Remains D. [read post]