Search for: "GREEN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 181 - 200 of 310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2017, 9:21 am by Matthew Kahn
Those replacements will serve in Alabama, the District of Columbia, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As of this writing, 33 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws legalizing marijuana in some form. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by Josh Blackman
Judge Silberman alleged that Judge Sullivan (D.D.C.) should not be able to sit on the District of Columbia's judicial selection committee. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 1:20 pm by June Casey
Lazarus also does an excellent job illuminating the inner workings of the Supreme Court and of the second most important court in the land—the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Evan George
This unusual full-court press comes in the case of City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
The Court granted cert. in Green v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
District of Columbia, 20-331, involves D.C. and Maryland’s domestic emoluments clause challenge to Trump’s ownership interests in hotels and restaurants, and specifically the availability of the writ of mandamus to correct claimed errors. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm by Cary Coglianese
District Court for the Western District of Washington; Mary Saunders of ANSI; Peter L. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The question I’ve been asking in a series of recent posts is whether history can provide any insight into current claims that copyright law and the First Amendment conflict. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am by Alfred Brophy
Brittain, of the University of the District of Columbia, Pat K. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
The Justice Department was clearly aware of this, writing in filings in both the Western District of Washington and the District of Columbia that “the New Executive Order does not present a need for emergency litigation. [read post]