Search for: "Garland v. Dai"
Results 181 - 200
of 477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am
In Medium, Judith Schaeffer weighs in on Senate Republicans’ refusal to act on Garland’s nomination, noting that until “now, the longest the Senate has ever taken to vote on a Supreme Court nominee after one had been named was 125 days,” and that months “after shattering that record, the Senate hasn’t even given Merrick Garland a hearing, let alone a vote. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am
In The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports on the aftermath of the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:19 am
V. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:05 pm
B Nagesh, a student of C V Raman High School, told his parents of his marriage with his Hindi teacher D Ramyasri four days later. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 12:57 pm
Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the unanimous court in Garland v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
The Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:44 am
Gore to Trump v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
At issue in Simmons v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:56 am
Commentary on United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
Commentary on last week’s decision in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:59 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on last week’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
Garland , 141 S. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 9:14 am
Perez v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Tony Francois highlights Foster v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:22 am
” Briefly: Commentary on this week’s supplemental briefs in Zubik v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:46 pm
The trial took place over several days in June 2010 and the ruling was released this month. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 12:38 pm
In Burdick v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 11:02 am
" Garland E. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
(relisted after the June 22 conference) Garland v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
HIF BIO, Inc., that Thermtron was “questionable in its day and is ripe for reconsideration. [read post]
