Search for: "Geico Insurance" Results 181 - 200 of 907
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2020, 4:42 am by Chris Earley
All insurance companies do this, including Geico, Liberty Mutual, State Farm, Arbella, Safety, etc. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
GEICO decision.The trial court had ruled in favor of the insured on the Sackett issue but against the insured on the household exclusion issue. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Shah filed a lawsuit against Mayo and the Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”), Mayo’s insurance provider. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
GEICO, 201 A.3d 131 (Pa. 2019), the increasingly liberal, judicially activist Pennsylvania Supreme Court shook up the automobile accident litigation world by eradicating the household exclusion not only in the case before it, but across the board. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Geico barred insurers from using the household exclusion to block stacked underinsured motorist coverage that had already been paid for, but did not apply in situations where stacking was voluntarily waived by the insureds.In Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
GEICO case might not even apply and the case would fall under the Craley v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
He also filed a civil suit on Charles’s behalf against GEICO, alleging it had breached its insurance policy by denying his claim. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 8:47 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Florida Catastrophic Injury Verdict Reversed In this case, the negligent driver of the car was insured by GEICO. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 5:11 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
GEICO decision.The trial court had ruled in favor of the insured on the Sackett issue but against the insured on the household exclusion issue.. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:16 am by help@sandbergphoenix.com
The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for GEICO and held that there was no evidence of a frivolous and unfounded refusal to pay its insured’s demand for the $25,000.00 limit of her underinsured motorist policy, which was needed to support a bad faith claim brought under Ga. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Geico, 201 A.3d 131 (Pa. 2019), in which that court invalidated the Household Exclusion in UM/UIM automobile policies, as a means to attack the Regular Use Exclusion as well.Under the Regular Use Exclusion, a carrier need not provide coverage to its insured where the insured was involved in an accident while using a vehicle that was regularly available for his or her use. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Geico, 201 A.3d 131 (Pa. 2019), which served to invalidate the Household Exclusion in automobile insurance policies, was relied upon in a recent Lebanon County case to deny a Defendant carrier's Preliminary Objections.In the case of Loose v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Insurance companies like GEICO offer uninsured bodily injury coverage of at least $30,000 per person and property damage cover of at least $15,000. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 12:15 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
GEICO, which addressed the validity of the Household Exclusion in automobile insurance policies. [read post]