Search for: "Gibson v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 6:56 am by Eric Goldman
“1-800 Contacts is paying Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP for my time, at a rate of $1,095 an hour and the time of research staff working on this matter. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:19 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
United States, 15-6060, the right to counsel pre-indictment case, in the morning, and United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 7:09 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
Yesterday, the Sixth Circuit granted en banc review in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:07 am
In today’s connected world, infringers can take advantage of U.S. commerce from outside the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
There have been three landmark cases issued by the Supreme Court during the last generation or two concerning the extent to which the presidency and the executive branch should be immune from legal and judicial processes and orders that would require disclosure of executive information and/or consumption of executive time: the famous Nixon Tapes case, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:51 am by Thomas Musmann
In response to the invalidation of its Canadian patents, Eli Lilly commenced international investment arbitration against Canada under Chapter 11 (Investment) of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) of 1994 between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 6:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Last night, the White House announced that President Trump will nominate acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco to be the next solicitor general of the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court will decide whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
United States, a 1997 Supreme Court case holding that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]