Search for: "Givens v. Clarke"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Lord Reed, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed, held that the scheme did fall foul of the principle of legality. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:08 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
Given that the reasons for the underlying decision were shrouded in doubt, the question became how to remedy the inadequacy. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:14 am
Judgment was given on 25 Oct 2017. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:35 am
The case is State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
In Katz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Allowing NML Capital’s appeal, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Clarke, Mance, Collins and Walker) held that it was entitled to do so. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 9:27 am
Martin v. [read post]
Clarke v. Hassan, 2011 ONSC 467 (S.C.J.) (Rule 29.1 – discovery plan, Rule 53.03 – expert witnesses)
17 May 2011, 12:51 pm
The discovery plan, agreed to by the plaintiff, specified that the plaintiff would be produced for discovery by the third party on a given date and would provide [...] [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
Jou v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
This seems to me to be the clearly correct result, given the Supreme Court’s decision in Clark v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
Nevertheless, the sole judgment of the Court (given by Lord Clarke) is admirably short and contains a useful statement of the existing principles, and so is well worth a read for commercial practitioners. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:04 pm
From Judge Stephen Clark's opinion in Steak N Shake, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
By contrast, as the Court of Appeal noted at para 42, in many of the leading cases the treatment in itself caused disadvantage: in Clark v Novacold Ltd [1999] ICR 951 the claimant was dismissed; in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] UKHL the claim was evicted; and in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] ICR 337 the claimant chief inspector had part of her duties as a manager removed. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
” His Lordship’s approach to construction was premised in part on Lord Clarke JSC’s summary of the relevant principles in Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, paras 14-30. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:25 pm
According to the 2002 case Morris v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
"The Los Angeles Review of Books reviews Clark Stoeckley's The United States v. [read post]
