Search for: "Givens v. Miller"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,993
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2017, 7:41 am
In 1976, in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 9:34 am
The latter is what the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals was looking at in Miller v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:57 am
In Canha v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
Moreover, given the political imperative to determine the case expeditiously and the likely delay which would be caused by a reference to the CJEU, it would seem that the Supreme Court would be extremely reluctant to go that route. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:05 pm
See People v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:27 pm
See, e.g., id. at 580 (discussing Miller v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:24 am
” The recent unreported Appellate Division decision of Miller v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:12 am
The United States Supreme Court in Miller-El [v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:04 pm
(I fear the Supreme Court may decide something to this effect in Florida v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 5:25 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 1:10 pm
In Lawrence v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 2:10 pm
I'm incredibly frustrated by this opinion by Justice Miller. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm
The United States Supreme Court today continued with its line of cases favoring children in the decisions of Miller v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:32 am
" Thus, consent was given, and Miller's argument is that at this point the deputy was finished writing the ticket. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
On February 4, 2019, the California Court of Appeal, Second District issued a 2-1 decision in Ward v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Author Mary Ziegler is the Stearns Weaver Miller Professor of Law at Florida State University College of Law. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
Among the significant cases addressing this issue are Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347; Branti v Finkel, 445 US 507 and Rutan v Republican Party of Illinois, 497 US 62.* Although the decision does not address Miller’s probationary obligation, "probationary employees" in fact hold permanent appointments and may enjoy limited tenure rights. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:37 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
