Search for: "Givens v. Quinn"
Results 181 - 200
of 311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2009, 7:02 pm
., v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 7:00 am
State of Illinois v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
., v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
Henry v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 2:23 pm
Douglas in Westermann v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 1:11 am
At the end of the week before the one in which the trial was scheduled to start, the Federal Circuit affirmed Judge Posner's claim construction of the '647 patent in an Apple v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:08 pm
Beginning in 2012, in Knox v. [read post]
BlackBerry afraid of transfer of its trollish patent lawsuit against Facebook to Northern California
7 Mar 2018, 4:46 am
The following year, the Supreme Court's famous eBay v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
Surely there will be plenty of candidates, given that two weeks ago the USPTO was named one of the best federal governmental agencies to work for (NASA was number one). [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 8:54 am
The U.S. district court will hold a trial in December, and the purpose of the injunction is to bar Huawei from leveraging two Chinese patent injunctions (granted by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court) before Judge Orrick has the chance to adjudicate a related claim.Like in the court below, Quinn Emanuel, as counsel for Samsung, is defending the Microsoft v. [read post]
The patent defendant's dilemma in Munich: damned if you do, damned if you don't give up your secrets
23 Dec 2018, 9:59 pm
The shocking part about last Thursday's Qualcomm v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm
The day before the FTC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Jed and Maggie, during brief periods of personal détente, actually quiz each other about the underlying facts of old cases, including Weems v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
P.D.V-G., Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:29 am
But Daimler, represented by Quinn Emanuel's Dr. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
A rather timely issue, given the recent public discussion of patent trolls, not to be confused with patent-leather trolls. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:43 am
Schick v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:32 am
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
The Oracle v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:27 pm
And we war-gamed the possible injunctive moves the parties could make given that the employees were all subject to non-compete agreements and given that California adamantly refuses to enforce such agreements. [read post]
