Search for: "Goode v. Department of Health" Results 181 - 200 of 2,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
California Department of Health Services, 07-956); the other asks the Court to clarify whether a debt is to be excused (”discharged”) in bankruptcy when the debt is owed to the company by an officer of the firm over mishandling of its funds. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm by Public Employment Law Press
A good faith interactive process is not an independent element of the disability discrimination analysis under the State HRL, and an employer may not be held liable based solely on its failure to engage in an interactive process with an employee (see Jacobsen v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm by Public Employment Law Press
A good faith interactive process is not an independent element of the disability discrimination analysis under the State HRL, and an employer may not be held liable based solely on its failure to engage in an interactive process with an employee (see Jacobsen v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
 An exemption would create an undue hardship for this medical defendant, which was required to follow the Department of Health's mandate that all hospital employees be vaccinated by September 27, 2021. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Ronald Mann
Compared to the other previews I’ve written for the March argument session, Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:23 am
Employee’s dismissal after refusing to participate in a counseling program held reasonable under the circumstancesSiciliano v Safir, 259 AD2d 366Matthew Siciliano, a New York City police officer, was dismissed from his position after he refused to enter the department’s counseling program. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:02 am
Siciliano had been given at least four direct orders to do so within six months.Siciliano claimed that his refusal to participate in the program (1) “was based upon his good faith reliance on his private psychiatrist’s advice that such would be harmful to his mental health,” and (2) that the Department had never explicitly warned him that he faced termination if he continued to disobey such orders. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department (Taxation) Mathieu v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am by Rosalind English
 Department of Health [2017] UKSC 41, 14 June 2017 – judgment here; previous post here. [read post]