Search for: "Grant et al v. The New York Times Company et al" Results 181 - 200 of 350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
For that point, the brief sites Seymour v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Decedent stood "in the type of relationship to the military at the time of his . . . [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
Huron Valley Steel, Reading Company, and Cooper Industries (the petitioner in a predecessor case, Cooper Industries v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
Under New York law, the no-action clause of a trust indenture barred noteholders' suit alleging that the corporation's issuance of a dividend and planned spin off a business were fraudulent transfers. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm by Kristen E. Polovoy
The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene et al., No. 654024/2015, Supreme Court of New York, New York County). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm by Kristen E. Polovoy
The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene et al., No. 654024/2015, Supreme Court of New York, New York County). [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:23 pm
They also love celebrities, soaps operas, staying positive and free speech, which is why Simone Kelly-Brown and OWN Your Power Communications, Inc v Oprah Winfrey et al, No. 12-1207-cv is such a tasty compendium of American tastes and obsessions, with a bit of trade mark law thrown in for good measure. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 6:12 am by Melissa Jacoby
The decision grants summary judgment in Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Motors Liquidation Company v. [read post]