Search for: "Gray v. Attorney General"
Results 181 - 200
of 512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
WPNA 1490 AM (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions CACF affirms TTAB ruling: X-PIPE is generic for engine exhausts Monty Allen Campbell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
WPNA 1490 AM (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions CACF affirms TTAB ruling: X-PIPE is generic for engine exhausts Monty Allen Campbell v. [read post]
Case Law: Raab MP v Associated – confidentiality agreements and libel proceedings – Gervase de Wilde
23 Dec 2011, 12:57 am
The Defendant also sought to rely on the principle that no impediment should be placed in the way of witnesses willing to give evidence, citing Lord Judge CJ in HM Attorney-General v MGN Ltd [2011] EWHC 2074. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 9:48 am
In the case of Wolfe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm
In Van Dyke v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
(Class 46) District Court of The Hague: Legal costs: Vetus v Inno Nautic (EPLAW) District Court of The Hague awards claim for ‘rest damage’: ABK Kunststoffen v Snoeks Automotive B.V (EPLAW) New Zealand NZ High Court clears patent attorneys of negligence: The Baby Hammock Co Limited v AJ Park Law (Patentology) Northern Ireland Ploughing a lonely furrow? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
(Class 46) District Court of The Hague: Legal costs: Vetus v Inno Nautic (EPLAW) District Court of The Hague awards claim for ‘rest damage’: ABK Kunststoffen v Snoeks Automotive B.V (EPLAW) New Zealand NZ High Court clears patent attorneys of negligence: The Baby Hammock Co Limited v AJ Park Law (Patentology) Northern Ireland Ploughing a lonely furrow? [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:47 am
The suit in Mendoza v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Those claims have been most prominently made by Michael Mukasey, a former Attorney General and federal judge, whom I much respect but who I think erred in this instance. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 8:31 pm
Rick Perry, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott and Gray County District Attorney Lynn Switzer. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
GMBH v Geox SPA (PatLit) (Gray on Claims) EWHC (Pat): PPDs and piecemeal litigation: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: When anticompetition spices up competition, greyhounds lose their appeal: Bookmakers’ Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd & Ors v Amalgamated Racing & Ors (IPKat) LOCOG demands Olympic Removals stop using Olympic symbol (IPKat) Infringing goods in transit: are patents more efficacious than trade… [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 10:20 am
The Office of the State Comptroller also raised concerns that the attorney general’s office has never examined whether a trooper’s gender, race or rank affects how they’re disciplined. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit) United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
: Simonian v Norvartis Animal Health US, Inc (Docket Report) US Copyright CCIA study finds fair use industry worth trillions (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) US bill on radio music royalties gets key backing (IP Watch) US Copyright – Decisions 7th Circuit: $60,000 sanction on attorney for bringing a copyright action: Tillman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under… [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Supreme Court decided Gray v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
In Advisers, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:19 pm
Skye Gray , Applicant v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:58 pm
Waterman has not been denied an incident report in general; was not denied one in Marshall v. [read post]
