Search for: "Greenfield v. Greenfield"
Results 181 - 200
of 554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
You will recall, perhaps, that I am a defendant in The Litigation Commonly Known as Rakofsky v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:26 am
Here’s Scott Greenfield at Simple Justice. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:29 pm
In Aguilar v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 4:28 am
When the Court refused Georgia's attempt to seize Cherokee lands (Wooster v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:23 am
., Inc. v Erie County Water Auth., 115 AD3d 1351, 1351-1353 [4th Dept 2014]). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 8:33 am
The suit, Cantrell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:05 pm
[Michael Greve, Jonathan Adler, Daniel Fisher first and second on Bank Markavi v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 10:15 am
We remember Marbury v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:43 am
’” Rova Farms Resorts, supra, 65 N.J. at 483-84 (quoting Greenfield v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:44 am
In M v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 10:51 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:20 am
Even if the plaintiff had sufficiently pleaded this allegation, she “failed to allege sufficient facts to establish that the[ ] defendants intended to deceive the court” or the plaintiff (Klein v Rieff, 135 AD3d 910, 912; see Ticketmaster Corp. v Lidsky, 245 AD2d 142, 143; Thomas v Chamberlain, D’Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield, 115 AD2d 999, 999-1000). [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 3:06 am
Ross, Short Circuit, on U.S. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
Where the motion papers demonstrate that the defendant’s right to testify before the grand jury has not been “scrupulously protected,” the “mandatory language” of CPL § 190.50(5) “creates what is a ministerial duty on the part of the court to dismiss an indictment obtained in violation of a defendant’s right to appear before the Grand Jury” (Matter of Borrello v Balbach, 112 AD2d 1051 [2nd Dept 1985]; see also, People v… [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am
Briefly: At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern discusses Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 4:24 am
The stipulation of settlement recited, among other things, that the defendant reviewed and understood its terms, had an opportunity to consult with counsel and have the legal and practical effect of the stipulation fully explained to him, executed the stipulation voluntarily, without coercion or pressure of any kind, and believed the stipulation to be fair and reasonable (see Chamberlain, D’Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield, LLP v Wilson, 136 AD3d 1326, 1328; Schiff… [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Citing Greenfield v Philles Records, 98 NY2d 562, the Appellate Division disagreed, explaining that "It is well settled that "a written agreement that is complete, clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms," and whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:54 am
Despite all of this and despite the presumed lens through which Wypijewski walked into the courtroom in the trial of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
Greenfield, Stein & Senior LLP NASSAU COUNTYCivil Practice Partner Directed to Appear at Deposition, Answer Questions Regarding Dispute in Prior Partnership Lipp v. [read post]
