Search for: "Griffin v. California" Results 181 - 200 of 277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2016, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
California Teachers Association for this blog, while Mark Walsh did the same for Education Week and Ross Runkel weighs in at his eponymous blog.At Casetext, Sidney Rosdeitcher weighs in on last week’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Securities Litigation, 60 F.3d 591, 592 (9th Cir. 1995) (applying California law); In re Actimmune Marketing Litigation, 614 F. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
California 13-494Issue: (1) Whether, as some courts have held, reviewing courts are required to accord “great deference” to unexplained Batson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 7:01 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: Denver’s top employment hearing officer sues over gender pay inequality, June 17, 2016, By Kirk Mitchell, The Denver Post More Blog Entries: Griffin v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:43 am by Paul Levy
Although California provides for awards of attorney fees when an anonymous speaker prevails against a meritless subpoena, the case also raises the prospect of arguing that the very filing of the lawsuit may have violated the Union Members’ Bill of Rights under the Landrum-Griffin Act. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm by Timothy Kim
Employers are anticipating that the new Board and General Counsel will reform the following Obama-era precedents: Browning-Ferris Indus. of California, et al. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm by Timothy Kim
Employers are anticipating that the new Board and General Counsel will reform the following Obama-era precedents: Browning-Ferris Indus. of California, et al. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Plaintiff alleged breach of implied and express warranties under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA), 15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq., and breach of contract and unconscionability under California law. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:24 pm by Shea Denning
The Court of Appeals of Virginia applied a fact-based approached in  Griffin v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
California, in which the Court held that police must obtain a warrant before they can search the cellphone of someone whom they have arrested. [read post]