Search for: "HOPE v. WALKER" Results 181 - 200 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm by NL
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm by NL
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:18 am by SHG
  And following a decision out of the Bronx by Judge Edgar Walker in People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
Such hope as there was for the mandate reposed now – precariously – on the Chief, and in some small “c” conservative instinct he might retain in the name of restraint. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:36 am by Blog  Editorial
Lord Phillips – Law Lady Hale – Law Lord Mance – Law Lord Kerr – Law Lord Clarke – Law Lord Reed – Law Lord Carnwath – Law Lord Hope – Classics Lord Walker – Classics and Law Lord Dyson – Classics Lord Sumption – History Lord Wilson – Jurisprudence Lord Neuberger – Chemistry [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:03 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
Following the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on a preliminary reference, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Dyson) held a further hearing in this appeal on July 4. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Many people feel it is vital that FDAC and the qualities of Inner London survive and flourish at the Registry and we would hope to work with you to ensure this. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:25 pm by Michelle Yeary
Second, any contested issues of fact must be construed in the plaintiff's favor.Id. at *5-6 (quoting Walker v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
Walker, 11-1011, which presents (among other things) the question left open two Terms ago in Wood v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:42 am
In particular, in paragraphs 16 and 17 of the judgments of Lord Walker and Baroness Hale in Jones v Kernott they said:16. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 21 May 2012 in the Privy Council is the appeal of ANS & anor v ML, listed for two days in front of a panel of five (L Hope, L Hale, L Wilson, L Reed, L Carnwath). [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting this morning in the Supreme Court is the appeal of Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, listed for two days in front of a panel of five (L Hope, L Walker, L Kerr, L Clarke, L Dyson). [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am by INFORRM
On 8 to 10 May 2012 the Supreme Court (Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson) heard Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against decision that he should provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am by Blog  Editorial
On 8 to 10 May 2012 the Supreme Court (Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson) heard Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against decision that he should provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]