Search for: "HUMPHREYS v. DAY"
Results 181 - 200
of 228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
Sal Humphreys. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm
Indeed, after 1975 the Court delivered a series of landmark judgments, including, for example, Golder v UK (1975), Engel v the Netherlands (1976), Tyrer v UK (1978), Marckx v Belgium (1979) and Sunday Times v UK (1979). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 4:50 pm
v=P4DHSGeuQQE Remember what you just heard. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:32 pm
Humphrey. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:10 pm
The Humphrey case was cited in 1989, by the Beaumont Court of Appeals in the case, State Farm General Insurance Company v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Here is my full series on the 60 Day Rule:The Raw Milk Beat Goes On: A Look at the Literature and the 60-Day Raw Milk Cheese Aging RuleIntroductionSome say raw milk cheeses are being beat-up by US regulators this year. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:44 am
To take a simple example, Brown v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:33 am
There are at least four potential outcomes that may result from FDA’s recent actions: 1) a ban on all cheeses made from raw milk, 2) an extension of the 60-day aging period to 90-days or longer depending on evidence from the literature, 3) adoption of a European-type approach with intense regulation of animal health and hygiene during processing, but no aging rule, or 4) no change in the 60-day aging rule in the US. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:24 am
The Tax Court found this approach sensible in Humphrey v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:22 am
Godard, V. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:34 pm
Bacterial pathogens that can survive in cheeses aged for 60 days. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:30 am
Godard, V. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:42 pm
D’Amico (2008a) suggests that this study, combined with the earlier data on typhoid fever illnesses not attributed to cheese cured for more than 63 days, is the likely origin of the 60-day curing period in the US. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 10:38 pm
Castillo v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 12:01 am
Kachlon v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:16 pm
Further, case law has long held that an employee may not be found guilty of acts of misconduct or incompetence that have not been charged [Shuster v Humphrey, 156 NY 231]. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:22 pm
Humphrey (S.Ct. 5/27/08) and Gomez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:26 am
In McCleskey v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:15 am
Bailey of Jones Day's Washington, D.C., and Pittsburgh offices. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
This is the case for law-making pursuant to Article I, Section 7, for admitting new states to the union pursuant to Article IV, Section 3, and even for calling a new constitutional convention pursuant to Article V. [read post]
