Search for: "HUSBAND v. HUSBAND" Results 181 - 200 of 12,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 4:16 am by sally
Prest v Prest and others [2012] EWCA Civ 1395; [2012] WLR (D) 296 “The court had no jurisdiction in ancillary relief proceedings under section 24(1)(a) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 to order a party (the husband) to transfer to the wife assets held by companies of which the husband was the controller or controlling shareholder, on the basis of that he was ‘entitled’ to them.” WLR Daily, 26th October 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:09 am
Soulsbury v Soulsbury [2007] EWCA Civ 938 “An agreement whereby a wife waived her entitlement to periodical payments from her former husband under an order of court on the promise of her former husband to leave her £100,000 in his will was legally effective even though it had not been approved by the court. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 9:51 am by admin
 In this case, the divorce judge did not err in finding personal jurisdiction over husband pursuant to the long-arm statute based on allegations in wife’s complaint that  i) husband deserted her on specific date; ii) husband’s desertion had continued since that date without interruption and husband has not returned to the matrimonial domicile iii) wife was domiciled in and a bonafide resident of Virginia; iv) husband lived abroad;… [read post]
8 May 2015, 12:14 pm
Customers can always count on insurance companies to play hardball, and the case of Connors v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 2:00 pm by admin
In Dickson v Dickson , the Virginia Court of Appeals ruled that the award of spousal support was a periodic payment award subject to modification upon a change in circumstances such as husband’s bankruptcy discharge of the equitable distribution award to wife. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Last week’s decision of the Appellate Division, First Department, in Campbell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 6:04 am by admin
In an unpublished opinion, the Virginia Court of Appeals upheld the Circuit Court’s denial of a reduction in the case of Lane v. [read post]