Search for: "Hales v. Hales" Results 181 - 200 of 1,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Lord Walker and Lady Hale gave the lead judgment. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am by Rosalind English
Norris v United States [2010] UKSC 9 SC (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Judge, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr) 24 February 2010 In determining whether interference with an individual’s right to a family life was justified to achieve the aim of extradition, the court should not consider whether the circumstances were exceptional but should consider whether the consequences were exceptionally serious SUMMARY The appellant had recently… [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:40 am by Adam Levitin
 JPMorgan Chase Bank, armed with six partners at two AmLaw 100 firms (Wilmer Hale and McGuire Woods) took the truly unusual step of filing an objection to an amicus curiae brief I filed in a 9th Circuit case called McShannock v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 12:53 pm by arester
This lecture will trace the evolution of the doctrine from its common law origins in Sir Matthew Hale's seventeenth century treatise, De Portis Maris (Of the Gates of the Sea) through its incorporation into American Constitutional Law to the major synthesis of rate regulation in the 1944 decision in Hope Natural Gas v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:21 pm by Eric E. Johnson
New Jersey Supreme Court Opinion: Too Much Media, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 2:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lady Hale and Lord Wilson had some misgivings about the judge’s judgment. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Dollar General Corp v MI Band of Choctaw Indians_HALE An excerpt: The State has joined in support of the Petitioner despite the fact that the State of Mississippi has made the policy decision that on-reservation torts arising in Mississippi should not consume State resources and are better addressed by tribal institutions. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
D. and A. v United Kingdom 32949/17 34614/17 The Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissenting) found justified discrimination in imposing the bedroom tax on a woman who, as a result of domestic violence, had had her home treated under the Sanctuary Scheme to include the modification of the attic to render it a “panic room”. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 10:37 am
Not for the first time, Nearly Legal has drawn my attention to the case of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames, this time as it reaches the House of Lords. [read post]