Search for: "Hall v. Doe et al"
Results 181 - 200
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2008, 6:45 pm
Perry, et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
("Zurich") provided insurance coverage to Horizon Natural Resources Co., et al., ("the Debtors") during the pendency of the Debtors' Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:36 pm
Calif , et al., No. 07-70293 (8-6-08). [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
: (Techdirt), User generated font community: (Techdirt), Copyright has stretched so far that it has broken – discussion of R Fleischer’s article in ‘Future of copyright’ series: (Techdirt), Antigua doesn’t see settlement with US over WTO plan to let it ignore US copyrights: (Techdirt) Events 16 June: USPTO town hall meeting on industrial designs - Alexandria: (Daily Dose of IP), 16 June / 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:18 pm
Oregon Department of Agriculture, et al. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Dilanchian), The three dysfunctions of a complex IP legal team: (IP Law360), IP litigation and WIPO: (Ezine @rticles), Time to nominate IP Hall of Fame inductees: (IAM), Product packaging and patent protection: (IP Law360), Understanding the value of IPRs in the context of fashion and visual arts: (Ezine @articles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands How logos, shapes and colours are remembered: (Class 46), Now obsolete .su (Soviet Union) domains… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
Supreme Court, has consistently remained opposed to cameras within its own hallowed halls. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Geeklawyer, an IP lawyer, does manage to slip in a bit of law from time to time - but, mercifully, his blawg provides, for me, other attractions. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
Having determined that the due process requirement was no longer viable in light of the Supreme Court's decision in N.L.R.B. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Cullen issued his decision Feb. 20, 2003. *** BE&K Construction Co. (32-CA-9479, et al.; 351 NLRB No. 29) Pittsburg, CA Sept. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:17 pm
Specifically, the Circuit Court's ruling in Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:25 pm
As usual, Orwell has it right; Bollinger et al. have it wrong. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
Gallagher et al., like Hall (1995), found a significant treatment effect for cognitive-behavioural treatment, but did not find an effect for hormonal treatments. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 10:40 am
" In Indiana Department of Financial Institutions, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
A Lot of Reporters Must Be Calling Al Qaeda (May 15, 2006)101. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
The determination of whether a claim is statute barred by the limitation period does not fall within the discretion of the Court. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 11:14 am
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, LLP., et al. [read post]
