Search for: "Handy v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2015, 11:29 am
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies relevant… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
R (Lumsdon & Ors) v Legal Services Board [2015] UKSC 41, 24 June 2015 (see judgment). [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:07 am
State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:04 am
Handy v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
” The Times objects that “[t]his unqualified statement seems to contravene American constitutional and case law, and offers other countries that routinely censor the press a handy reference point. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
The BIS webpage on its consultationpage previously stated:“A final report on the important issues will be published in September 2014. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:49 am
Handy, 326 N.C. 532, 539 (1990); see also State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The legal question for the court in Devorah H. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 1:09 am
Here is a handy hint. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
However, in welcoming new readers we take this opportunity to alert them to this handy facility. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:38 am
In the recent case of Tolman v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:55 am
The first phone was a greatinvention, but the second onereally came in handy ...Three days to go ... and the IPKat's sidebar poll on the European Inventor Award has passed the 500 responses mark. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:30 am
The court’s decision in Elkind v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 2:23 pm
The ruling in ACLU v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:39 am
” Adding some handy statistics: “Of those now in their eighties, only half were homeowners or had a mortgage by their fifties. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
The case is Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm
The correct test for demonstrating prima facie discrimination per Moore v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Instead, just include it loose, together with a completed form 1040-V (downloads as a pdf) in your envelope. [read post]
