Search for: "Harms v. IRS" Results 181 - 200 of 426
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
And they only found out, apparently, when folks started getting notices from CMS and the IRS about coverage info.So, no harm, no foul, you say? [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While Congress continues to debate the future of the Obamacare health reforms and its exchanges, the Department of Health & Human Services is reminding employers with less than 50 employees that wish to offer group health coverage for their employees to check out their coverage options offered the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Marketplace established as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
In Corway v Independent Newspapers [1999] 4 IR 485, [2000] 1 ILRM 426, [1999] IESC 5 (30 July 1999) (noted here), the Supreme Court held that there was no clear statutory definition of blasphemy to give effect to this provision. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
Instead, if grand jury proceedings continue, we may still exercise jurisdiction in order to remedy future harm. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
Tax refund checks due to him from the IRS were sent to a person in Nevada using his social security number. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by INFORRM
Section 4 had been discussed in Barron v Vines [2015] EWHC 1161 (QB) (29 April 2015), and Yeo v Times Newspapers Ltd [2015] EWHC 3375 (QB) (25 November 2015), but Economou v de Freitas is the first time it has been successfully invoked. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:06 pm by Michael Grossman
A pair of favored examples are Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants, aka “The Hot Coffee Case,” and Pearson v Chung, or “The Pants Lawsuit. [read post]