Search for: "Harris v. Commissioner"
Results 181 - 200
of 304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
The news received mixed coverage by the press and Harry and Meghan have been strongly criticised by some news outlets. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
The decision in Reidel v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
Harris appears to have responded to a post on the Legal Cheek blog here. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:56 am
(IP Think Tank) US Copyright – Decisions Tenenbaum found guilty of wilful copyright infringement, hit with $675,000 fine (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The IP Factor) (Excess Copyright) (Public Knowledge) (IPKat) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amazon – Amazon hit with class action lawsuit over Kindle deletion (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (EFF) Associated Press – Rights… [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm
Second, at 10.30am on the same date in Court 1 Foskett J will hand down judgment on the renewed application for permission to apply for judicial review by Lord Prescott, Chris Bryant MP and others (R (on the application of Bryant and ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
” Data Privacy and Data Protection On 22 June 2023, the Upper Tribunal confirmed the civil standard of proof applied in information law litigation with the judgment in Doorstep Dispensaree Lts v Information Commissioner [2023] UKUT 123 (AAC). [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., about whether the Hobbs Act requires a [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am
Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd heard 25 February 2011 (Tugendhat J) Lewis v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard 3 and 4 March 2011 (Tugendhat J) ETK v News Group Newspapers, heard 10 March 2011 (Ward, Laws and Moore-Bick LJJ) [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Council of Europe had a piece, and the ICO’s website also had a statement from Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
The Mates court considered the commissioners' comment to the Uniform Act significant, and stated: The commissioners' comment to section 302 states in part that '[o]ne who has just entered the forum state may commence the proceeding immediately, thus enabling the court to enter such temporary orders as are necessary to protect the rights of the parties.' (9A Uniform Laws Annotated sec. 302, Commissioners' Comment, at 122 (1979).) [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:45 am
An article authorizing the town to borrow up to $200,000 to upgrade residential septic systems to comply with state Title V regulations. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 3:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Harris Associates Docket: 08-586 Argument date: November 2, 2009 Question presented: Federal law imposes duties on investment managers regarding the funds they manage. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
This portion of the NPRM may appear insignificant and narrow, but the Commission clearly implies its view that Section 706 provides no statutory authority to impose regulatory safeguards under any circumstances. [16] Even if the current FCC Commissioners did retain the option of regulatory intervention, an already expressed view that the wired and wireless broadband marketplace operates competitively strongly implies that a majority Republican FCC would never seek to impose… [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
This portion of the NPRM may appear insignificant and narrow, but the Commission clearly implies its view that Section 706 provides no statutory authority to impose regulatory safeguards under any circumstances. [16] Even if the current FCC Commissioners did retain the option of regulatory intervention, an already expressed view that the wired and wireless broadband marketplace operates competitively strongly implies that a majority Republican FCC would never seek to impose… [read post]
