Search for: "Harris v. Doe et al" Results 181 - 200 of 308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2012, 8:34 am by Bridget Crawford
What VAWA Does Right The VAWA reauthorization bill provides funding for critical services and includes important law reform that will improve women’s access to justice. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm by Donna Coker
What VAWA Does Right The VAWA reauthorization bill provides funding for critical services and includes important law reform that will improve women’s access to justice. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:35 am by charley foster
District Court's Order Denying Temporary Restraining Order in Emmanuel Temple, et al. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) (possible facial unconstitutionality of a [state] statute does not in itself justify an injunction against good-faith attempts to enforce it, absent any showing of bad faith, harassment, or any other unusual circumstance that would call for equitable relief). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:58 pm
UBS Financial Services Inc. 80.8M 212 Investment Corp. et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
Obama, et al. (11-117); National Federation of Independent Business, et al., v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a case that implicates the constitutional authority of all three branches of the government: Zivotofsky, et al., v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:23 pm
Harris Research et al (CAFC 2010-1207, -1226) nonprecedential; Judges Bryson (author), Mayer and Gajarsa The CAFC portrays that Mytee's lawyers were lacking. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]